10 Typical Mistakes to Avoid in Book Review Writing
Students are assigned various academic papers and a book review is one of them. It’s a traditional assignment, which should reveal the ability of critical thinking of a student. When a student writes a book review, he or she should analyze a certain chapter or even the entire literature piece. He/she should draw fair and impartial conclusions concerning the entire book or one of its guidelines.
The task is interesting and rather complicated. Not all are able to express great critical thinking and most make some mistakes. A group of ENL essay writers from legitimate custom writing service offers the following typical mistakes you should be aware of to avoid them.
At first, we would like to divide them into three main categories. Every category has sub-types that make up those 10 mistakes. Please, look at our table.
|Writing and Style||Emotionality
|Structure and Language||Lack of background
|Credibility||Too general focus
Misuse of direct quotations
Use of unverified sources
Now, we’ll cast more light on these issues. Besides, we’ll give brief tips about how to avoid these mistakes.
Remember one important rule. You have no right to use emotional phrases. As it has been briefly mentioned above, a book review is an impartial assignment. Of course, we don’t claim that you must be emotionless. Nonetheless, your sentences should be restricted in some aggressive expressions, open negativism or criticism. Many students forget about it and are overly emotional in their judgments.
You aren’t allowed claiming that this or that literature piece is totally worthless or the best in the world. These are too brave claims. If you want to prove your point of view, you should convince your audience. Do it with patience and confidence. Use effective examples and clear explanations.
You likewise cannot give a personal opinion. It’s forbidden because it makes any book review subjective. Many students begin to judge from the very beginning and sometimes, it seems that their review is something deeply personal.
Your main purpose is to provide a clear analysis without any personal judgments. There is nothing you can do about this requirement even if you have a burning desire. However, you can give your own interpretation at the end. Your conclusion demands your opinion as well. Avoid obvious emotions. Remain patient and honest and stand your ground.
Many students plagiarize their book reviews. They forget about quotation marks or intentionally copy someone’s concepts. Follow the writing format and never violate its terms. You’ll be assigned APA, MLA, Chicago or other formats.
The problem with proper citing is very important. Many students insert long URLs. It spoils the readability of the text. It’s better to use references. Besides, not all know that while they cite they should add only the last name of the cited author.
Students likewise make incorrect citations, unjustified claims or simply forget to insert reference page numbers for citations they use. You should avoid unwitty plagiarizing at any cost. Define the assigned writing format and memorize the slightest details and requirements. Don’t forget about references. Always verify the claims you implement into the text.
Another great mistake is skipping a section of background. Students wish to go directly to the writing. They want to clarify their point of view during the text. However, the readers would like to know what the main purpose of the project is. If you don’t give background, they don’t know your intentions. It’s necessary to implement a pre-literature section. State the main keys, terms, methods of analysis and something of the kind.
Many folks have a poor organization of the structure. They write too long sentences, disclose multiple concepts in the same paragraph, don’t use logical transitions, etc. This makes any text unreadable.
To overcome this issue, use sub-headings. They clearly divide your text into logical blocks and sections. You can also make the structure more vivid if you add bullet lists, tables and so on.
Irrelevant content is another great error. It may take too long to explain a certain concept or implement an example. This steals time and doesn’t allow clarifying the main arguments. You should be straightforward and write sentences tightly related to the main question of your book review. If you feel that you go astray, rework your text.
Many students complicate their task when they don’t specify the purpose of their review. They select too general or broad themes. This obliges them to cover many categories and concepts that have no relation to their main goal. You should focus on a concrete issue and disclose it.
Students tend to rely on too many direct quotations. It’s allowed and recommended using direct quotations. Notwithstanding, students misuse them and insert too many of them. This works against them. It’s demanded to reveal your critical thinking and personal opinion. However, how can you do that if you constantly use the thoughts of other authors?
It’s forbidden to use non-scholarly sources. The use of unverified informative sources leads to potential complications. In case, the information cannot be confirmed you may introduce unreal assumptions and bring to ruin the whole project. If you claim something, be totally confident that you can trust the data you use. Look for official printed and electronic information sources.